Larry Grudzien Posted August 4 Posted August 4 I have just be hired by an employer that has not filed Form 5500 for many years. The employer can only find records for 10 years They are missing records for more than 10 years. Will the missing years be a problem if they go though the DOL's Delinquent Filer Program. Will the relief only apply for the filed years? Will the employer be subject to full penalties for the years they cannot file? Larry Grudzien
Paul I Posted August 5 Posted August 5 My understanding is there is no statute of limitations for non-filers. Also, you will need to navigate the IRS and DOL rules separately since the IRS commonly defers to plans who use the DOL DFVCP program, the IRS is not required to do so and can impose its own penalties and required corrections. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CORRECT THIS WITHOUT INVOLVING LEGAL COUNSEL WITH EXPERIENCE IN WORKING WITH BOTH THE DOL AND THE IRS. Since the data are not available, any correction will require negotiating with each agency, and this is more an art than it is a step-by-step procedure. A starting point will be confirming the years for which 5500s were required. This itself can be tricky for 403(b) plans when looking going back at many years past. May you be well-compensated for the journey you are about to undertake. Good luck! Lou S. and acm_acm 2
Jakyasar Posted August 5 Posted August 5 I am surprised that they were never contacted for missing 5500 forms in the past by the IRS or DoL unless they never filed in the first place. I agree with Paul that a legal counsel would be a wise a step especially where no records are available. Got to catch this before either IRS or DoL wakes up and asks for prior filings.
fmsinc Posted August 5 Posted August 5 In preparing QDROs it is typical for the parties or the court to value a defined contribution plan account as of a "Valuation Date". It might be the date the parties separated, the date the signed their Marital Settlement Agreement, the date of entry of the Judgment of Absolute Divorce, or some other mutually agreed upon date. The amount in the account as of the Valuation Date will commonly be adjusted for gains, losses and investment experience from the Valuation Date to the date the alternate payee's share is transferred to him/her. Such a transfers might be: (i) when the Alternate Payee's share is segregated into a separate account for his/her benefit; or, (ii) when the Alternate Payee's share is rolled over to the Alternate Payee's IRA or other eligible retirement account; or (iii) when the Alternate Payee takes a taxable distribution from all or a part of the balance to which he/she is entitled. The moment that the in-house Plan Administrator hires or changes a Third Party Administrator ("TPA") the TPA will no longer have access to any records that predate the TPA's involvement and will no longer be able to compute gains, losses and investment experience retroactively. The situation is the same if the Form 5500s were never filed and if the Plan Administrator does not have the records necessary to prepare them at this late date. The answers to most of your questions are online. David
Popular Post Artie M Posted August 5 Popular Post Posted August 5 We had a client with the same issue.... failed to file 11 years of 5500s for a 401(k)/PS but only had 8 years of information/data. Filed the plan under DFVCP, paid $4,000 per plan cap. We had discussions with the DOL because of the lack of data for the missing 3 years and were able to simply upload the incomplete 5500s (filing out primarily lines 1-4, marking a few of the boxes below that, with no schedules) with a letter of explanation, including the DFVCP case number and agent in charge, etc. DOL accepted it, never heard anything from the IRS. This was just one client's experience, it may or may not work for another. fmsinc, Lou S., Paul I and 2 others 4 1 Just my thoughts so DO NOT take my ramblings as advice.
fmsinc Posted August 6 Posted August 6 In a terrible accident at a railroad crossing, a train smashed into a car and pushed it nearly four hundred yards down the track. Though no one was killed, the driver of the car was injured and took the train company to court. At the trial, the engineer insisted that he had given the driver ample warning by waving his lantern back and forth for nearly a minute. He even stood and convincingly demonstrated how he'd done it. The jury believed his story, and the suit against the train company was decided in it's favor and against the driver of the car. "Congratulations," the lawyer for the train company said to the engineer when it was over. "You did superbly under cross-examination." "Thanks," he said, "but the other attorney sure had me worried." "How's that?" the lawyer asked. "I was afraid he was going to ask if the lantern was lit!" Belgarath 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now