Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Prior trustee probably committed prohibited transaction but not all facts are in so there is small chance he did not. Has either the IRS or DOL published any guidance as to when prohibited transactions must be reported.

Posted

The issue we have is that the transaction appears to be for the benefit of the former trustee but not all of the facts are established, though its hard to see how the PT rules are not triggered.

Posted

This is not just an excise tax issue, but also an issue under ERISA of making sure that any losses to the plan that were a consequence of the breach are recovered. The current trustee/fiduciaries has/have a duty to investigate and reach a conclusion as to whether the prior trustee committed a PT, and if they conclude one may have, to confront the prior trustee and demand either an explanation or compensation to the plan. Reporting the PT, or not, and paying excise tax is secondary and will be easier to figure out once you've taken first step of fiduciary investigation.

Alternatively, you could call the DOL and ask it to investigate.

Luke Bailey

Senior Counsel

Clark Hill PLC

214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600

Frisco, TX 75034

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use