rocknrolls2 Posted December 16, 2019 Posted December 16, 2019 I am new to working for multiemployer pension funds. I see a number of these plans are money purchase plans and they have a concept of deemed termination of employment, in which no contributing employer makes a contribution for an employee (for say, 6 or 12 months), then the employee is deemed to have terminated his/her employment and is entitled to commence distribution of his/her account balance. In the context of a money purchase plan, the IRS treats them as a pension plan and they require that the employee have a severance from employment. Thus, as applied to those types of provisions, the plan risks disqualification because there is no determination of whether the participant must have an actual severance from employment. Is the IRS view on these deemed termination of employment provisions less restrictive in the collective bargaining context or should the deemed termination of employment provision in a money purchase plan be read as also requiring an actual severance from employment? Does anyone have any legal authority to cite either way for such a proposition? Luke Bailey 1
Effen Posted December 17, 2019 Posted December 17, 2019 Good question...there is no less restrictive position for collectively bargained plans that I am aware of. Generally, if a person has no contributions for 6 - 12 months, that means they are not working for any contributing employers, or at least in a capacity that requires a contribution. It is possible that the person moved into a different job class that would not require a contribution - say from union to management. In that situation, I agree that the distribution might be a problem. I think it would be prudent to confirm the participant is no longer working for a contributing employer before the distribution is paid. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
rocknrolls2 Posted December 17, 2019 Author Posted December 17, 2019 Thank you, Effen. I guess the question I have is why didn't the IRS flag the issue when it was reviewing the plan for a determination letter?
mal Posted March 15, 2020 Posted March 15, 2020 There is no exception for multiemployer plans. In order to pay the termination benefit the participant must have experienced a complete and bona-fide separation of employment with all contributing employers. A person who moved into a management position with a contributing employer will not qualify. Many of our plans require participants to sign a form that outlines the separation rules and attest that they qualify. It's not perfect, but at least shows the Board is exercising due diligence.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now