EPCRSGuru Posted November 10, 2020 Posted November 10, 2020 Ok.... On line 6(f) of the 2019 5500 (total participant count) we reported 26,988 participants, which is correct. BUT on line 6(g) (participants with account balances) we reported 988. Obviously a brain freeze on the part of the filer. It is not a small plan and it has over $1 billion in assets. We have a difference of opinion--it is worth amending? I think it is a red flag to have such a discrepancy between participants and the number of account balances.
ESOP Guy Posted November 10, 2020 Posted November 10, 2020 This is my opinion. I can't cite anything. I normally think 99% of the time people over think these counts unless you are close the line where you move from not needing an audit to an audit. I would actually amend for the reason you stated in this case. I would add with the software our firm uses it is simple and not very time consuming. The hardest part would be someone has to call the client and apologize for the mistake. I would rather do that than have a discussion why an IRS letter or agent shows up asking about the number. In short the cost of amending seems low and the bad thing of not amending seems high even if you don't know the chances of it happening. In fact your firm may have spent more man hours (minutes most likely) debating to amend or not than how long it would take to do the change on the software. That is my 2 cents. Bill Presson, JackS and ESOPMomma 3
Belgarath Posted November 11, 2020 Posted November 11, 2020 What he said! Agree completely. Bill Presson 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now