 |
 |
 |
|
BenefitsLink
Message Boards Digest
November 9, 2017
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink Message Boards:
|
|
Chippy created a topic in 401(k) Plans
A year of service for vesting is 1,000 hours in a plan year. A SALARIED employee worked 5 months and was salaried for 881 hours during that time, but he worked overtime and had actual hours worked of 1,055. Would he get a year of vesting since he actually worked over 1,000 hours? My first thought is yes.
|
|
5500sorBust created a topic in 401(k) Plans
Plan A had uncorrected delinquent employee contributions when the final 5500 filing was prepared in March 2017 due to a merger into a new plan (assume a 1/1/17 - 3/1/17 reporting period). Is there guidance that points to the fact that although this plan is terminated, the uncorrected delinquent contributions still need to be reported on the new plan's 5500 filing?
|
|
WhoLetTheDogsOut created a topic in SEP, SARSEP and SIMPLE Plans
If an employer qualifies for the Hurricane Irma tax relief extension until 1/31/2018 for 2016 returns, do they also have until that date to adopt a SEP for 2016?
|
|
Jennifer D. created a topic in Distributions and Loans, Other than QDROs
Client has not funded employer contributions to its plan since 2013. He would like to take a loan from his account under the plan and use that money to fund the plan. The kicker is that he has already defaulted on a prior loan. The loan policy could be amended to permit him to take a loan even after a default, and we could include the prior loan and missed interest when calculating how much he can take out to fund the plan. But wouldn't this be a prohibited transaction because it's the employer who already defaulted, and while he may use the money to fund the plan, he might not pay it back again?
|
|
austin3515 created a topic in 457 Plans
If the proposal goes through to eliminate 457(f) does that affect the following plan design: $50,000 per year, vested in 5 years if continuously employed. Amounts paid out 30 days after vesting. I thought that was just the simple constructive receipt doctrine which is still intact. Eliminating 457(f) I would think does not impact that? Clearly once it is vested it must be paid. I realize that if 457(f) goes away the option for the participant to pay the taxes independently and leave the balances in their deferred is no longer an option (but for practical reasons I've never used that anyway).
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
|
 |
 |
Lois Baker, J.D., President loisbaker@benefitslink.com
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher davebaker@benefitslink.com
Holly Horton, Business Manager hollyhorton@benefitslink.com
Copyright 2017 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|
 |
 |
Unsubscribe |
Privacy Policy
|
 |
 |
|
 |