BenefitsLink.com logo   

BenefitsLink
Message Boards Digest

February 9, 2018

Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink Message Boards:

Author's photo

JPete created a topic in 401(k) Plans

ADP Testing for Three Plans in a Controlled Group

I have 3 employers and 3 plans. All are part of a controlled group. One plan is a safe harbor plan since 2011. Each plan has always conducted coverage and ADP/ACP testing on its own; they never considered the controlled group aspect until now. Is there an issue on a controlled group basis if each plan has always passed on an individual basis?
Number of replies posted  12 replies      Number of times viewed  96 views      Add Reply
 
[Advert.]

Signature Awards submission deadline extended to 2/16/18!

Sponsored by Plan Sponsor Council of America [PSCA]
Don't miss out on recognition for your hard work! Deadline to submit retirement plan education and communication programs: Feb. 16, 2018. Learn more. Winners will be announced at the 71st Annual National Conference May 1-2, 2018, Scottsdale, AZ.
Author's photo

AFJ created a topic in 403(b) Plans, Accounts or Annuities

Retroactive Increase in Employer Contributions?

Can an employer retroactively increase the employer contribution formula? If so, what is the allowable time period to do so? Could the retroactive increase be applied as many as 24 months ago?
Number of replies posted  4 replies      Number of times viewed  49 views      Add Reply
Author's photo

RRivera created a topic in 401(k) Plans

Two-Participant Retirement Plan: Top Heavy?

A retirement plan has two employees: the owner and an employee. Testing resulted in the owner being top heavy at 64%. However, they are a Safe Harbor at 4% as well as the prior year. Is there any additional requirement on part of the owner on contributions?
Number of replies posted  2 replies      Number of times viewed  49 views      Add Reply
Author's photo

Flyboyjohn created a topic in Health Plans (Including ACA, COBRA, HIPAA)

Combined Plan Document and SPD

I've encountered several law firms that are preparing a single document that they represent is BOTH the ERISA welfare plan document and Summary Plan Description. (Maybe the law firms are using the same 3rd party welfare document vendor?) Seems to me that ERISA requires two separate documents. In the qualified plan arena I can't imagine trying to use the plan document as the SPD or vice versa. Interested in what others think of this approach.
Number of replies posted  2 replies      Number of times viewed  38 views      Add Reply
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146

Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager

Copyright 2018 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy