|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink
Message Boards Digest
March 25, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink Message Boards:
|
|
BG5150 created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
Company A, which has a 401(k) plan, buys Company B (with no plan) today, and grants all service with Company B. The plan has the standard 21/1/semi-annual entry. When do the new employees enter the plan, assuming they all satisfied the 21/1 requirements? Can they be held out until 7/1, or do they have to be immediately be eligible since they have their 1 yr of service and already have passed an entry date, similar to a rehired employee?
|
|
cpc0506 created a topic in 401(k) Plans
Employer A was a participating employer in a PEO. PEO had a safe harbor 401k plan. PEO plan is a calendar year plan. Employer A has decided to leave the PEO 401k plan and establish its own plan. Effective in April, they want to spin out of the PEO into their own plan. It is my understanding that client would be subject to ADP/ACP test for the short year under the PEO because the safe harbor provisions were not in effect for a 12 month period. Is that correct? My thought is that the Plan (effective in 2019) essentially would be a new start-up plan for this Employer A with assets attributable to them being transferred from the PEO. This would be Employer A's #001 plan. If the 2019 Plan is a start-up (effective April 1, 2019) and this Employer wants to have a fiscal year end 9/30 PYE, would they be eligible to establish this Plan as a Safe Harbor plan? There obviously would be more
than 3 months left in the PY to make elective deferrals, but would this fail the safe harbor rules of no consecutive short plan years? What about establishing the Plan Year as April 1 to March 31 for an initial full 12 months and then change to another fiscal year end in the future if need be?
|
|
BG5150 created a topic in 401(k) Plans
Participant took a hardship in 2018, but the employer did not suspend the deferrals. What to do now? I think we just suspend the deferrals for 6 months going forward. Right? What about the "no more suspension" rules for hardships?
|
|
Dougsbpc created a topic in Defined Benefit Plans, Including Cash Balance
Have a one-participant traditional DB plan that has existed for 4 years. The employer (and participant) never had, and never will have, any employees. The participant is age 55 and the plan currently has NRA of 62. If the participant's accrued benefit is grandfathered, is there any problem increasing the NRA to 65?
|
|
Sleuth created a topic in Distributions and Loans, Other than QDROs
In mid-December 2019 I instructed my investment firm to transfer funds from my traditional IRA to establish a new Roth IRA and NOT to withhold taxes. I realized the 1st week of February that they withheld 10% and issued a 1099-R reflecting it. I requested a refund of the withholding at that time. They are telling me they can't refund the withholding because of the 945-X definition of "Administrative Error." I want the funds returned back into either IRA account. Is this possible, or is this $400+ billion firm not being truthful?
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
|
|
|
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|