|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink
Message Boards Digest
April 12, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink Message Boards:
|
|
TMWIH created a topic in Litigation and Claims
Meeting with an ex-wife tomorrow. She is a plan participant, age 65, retired. She and ex-husband divorced 10 years ago, both pro se. Judgment provided for division of her retirement account, but no QDRO was drafted. Husband died recently. Daughter of the couple is designated as the sole beneficiary. Estate is seeking to recover portion of the ex-wife's retirement account based upon divorce judgment. Valid claim?
|
|
[Advert.]
The retirement services industry's leading event for top marketing, sales, administration and record keeping professionals. Comprehensive agenda is designed to meet the needs of 401(k) Plan Providers, Financial Advisors and Record Keepers.
|
|
SSRRS created a topic in Defined Benefit Plans, Including Cash Balance
Client had Corp A (since 2009) which had sponsored a DB plan since 2012. In March 2019 he sold Corp A but the corporation is still in existence and its only asset is approximately $10,000 in cash. In April 2019 he set up a Corp B (set up a corp and purchased the assets of a business). Corp B has new employees and does not perform the same services that Corp A did. [1] Is he allowed to continue the DB Plan of Corp A but sponsored by Corp B (so that he has prior service and benefits and a salary average calculation based on comp from Corp A)? [2] If yes, is this Corp B owner the only employee eligible to participate in the plan for 2019 (because he has a year of service for Corp A and is the only employee who will have at least 1,000 hours for 2019)?
|
|
david rigby created a topic in Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs)
A discussion on the Litigation message board which may be of interest to readers of this QDRO message board: https://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?/topic/64088-alternate-payee-dies-before-qdro-does-his-estate-have-a-valid-recovery-claim/
|
|
tghooper created a topic in Cross-Tested Plans
We had to reduce an owner's contribution due to the 30-day crediting rule. The owner is self-employed and wants the maximum contribution but will be limited to $41,000, including catch-up. A refund of $10,000 in elective deferrals was necessary per EPCRS Rev. Proc. 2008-50 and plan document. ERISA Outline Book says these refunds of elective deferrals are disregarded for 402(g)/ADP Test. The plan is a Safe Harbor 3%. The total contribution of $41,000 was used for cross-testing due to the limit. Should elective deferrals be $18,500 or $10,500 in doing the cross-testing? I'm inclined to say the later but corrective distributions are generally included for the ABT. If the former is used, I'm basically "making up" for the that amount that has will be refunded, which doesn't feel right. This affects the minimum gateway because we're trying to get to the $41,000.
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
|
|
|
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|