|
Sammiemor created a topic in 401(k) Plans
Hello, I am hoping to find study materials (willing to pay a discounted price for used materials) to prepare me for taking DC-1 and DC-2 exams. Unfortunately, my current employer isn't a supporter of receiving designations, so I must pay for everything myself. I did receive an APA while working for a TPA firm years ago, but I understand how valuable the QKA designation is, in my industry. My goal is to obtain a QKA before this year ends :). Any help would be hugely appreciated.
|
|
Gruegen created a topic in 401(k) Plans
It seems that with the recent Abbott Labs Private Letter Ruling (201833012), as well as announcements from large recordkeepers (Empower and Fidelity), there is a lot of noise about integrating a student loan repayment program with a retirement plan. Now, we can argue whether it makes sense to do such integration, but nevertheless, HR managers are seeing the headlines and are asking questions. Suppose a company provides student loan repayment program under which the company will reimburse (ie - make a payment directly to the employee's creditor) dollar for dollar of the employee's student loan repayments of up to $1,200 each year. The employer would develop procedures to substantiate the student loan repayments made by the employee. Further, I assume that the $1,200 reimbursement would be taxable to the employee. Further also suppose that this company offers a 401(k) retirement plan that
provides a 50% up to 6% non-safe harbor matching contribution. So for an employee with compensation of $40,000 and a 6% deferral rate, the employee would receive a $1,200 matching contribution. The company wants to manage employee benefit costs, so the employer would not want an employee to receive both the $1, 200 student loan repayment AND a $1,200 matching contribution under the retirement plan. Could the plan document be written to exclude "Employees Participating in a Student Loan Repayment Program" from being eligible to receive non-safe harbor matching contributions? Assuming that the plan's matching coverage is greater than 70%, are there any other problems with this approach?
|