|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink
Message Boards Digest
August 21, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink Message Boards:
|
ombskid created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
Business owner wants to use part of his profit sharing segregated account to make a mortgage loan to an unrelated individual. Proper documentation and an attachment or lien will be filed. Any problem with this type of loan?
|
[Advert.]
Find out why we are the fastest-growing ERISA Compliance Service in the industry. Outstanding authors, customer satisfaction & support. Contact us to see what we can do for you. sales@erisapedia.com or 612-605-2266
|
justanotheradmin created a topic in 401(k) Plans
Small employer has a a fairly vanilla 401(k) plan with deferrals, safe harbor, and profit sharing. Would like to reduce the contribution to the NHCE by adding an excluded class. The one HCE also would be excluded from everything except deferrals. A number of the eligible NHCE would be excluded from the plan. Assuming coverage testing passes, this feels like a cut-back, or a violation of BRF, but I know the ability to defer is not protected, nor is right to receive an employer contribution. Usually if initially setting up a plan we are proactive in class exclusions as part of the design process, so I don't see requests for exclusions after the fact and just feel like I am missing something. Is there something that would prohibit or make this type of amendment problematic?
|
thepensionmaven created a topic in Defined Benefit Plans, Including Cash Balance
We have a SHNE 401(k) with voluntary contributions, all testing done. Affected participants of course owners, removed the excess and claimed the earnings as taxable. In calculating the excess, SHNE for these HCEs was not contributed. Plan doc allows SHNE for owners, but I believe the thinking was, since the SH contribution has not been made yet, why treat as excess. Is it permissible for the owners to "waive" the SHNE for 2018, or do they have to contribute, then remove it from the plan?
|
KaJay created a topic in Retirement Plans in General
An employer's personnel manual (dated 1998) states all employees are eligible to participate in the 403(b) plan. The same employer's plan document (2009) provides a default eligibility for employees working at least 20 hours per week. For employees working for the employer 2009 and beyond, which document governs participation eligibility?
|
|
|
|
|
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
(407) 644-4146
|
|
|
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Copyright 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.
Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers; we were not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.
|
|
|
Unsubscribe |
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|