"Plan has 401(k) deferrals and profit sharing. Top heavy. Eligibility for the 401(k) is age 21, 1 month of service, entering monthly. The profit sharing minimum age is 21, 1 YOS, entering quarterly. It is a new comparability plan with each person in their own group.
"One employee has a DOB in 1993 and a DOH of 9/29/2017. Hired as an intern. On 10/24/2019, she was reclassified as a "regular employee." She did not complete the 1,000 hours service requirement during the 9/27/2017 - 9/26/2018 period or the 1/1/2018 - 12/31/2018 period. She will complete the YOS during the 1/1/2019 - 12/31/19 period. Based on her data, she will become a participant in the 401(k) portion on the date that she becomes a regular employee (10/24/2019) and she can begin to defer immediately. Because she did not meet the YOS previously, she will not become a participant in the profit
sharing portion of the plan until 1/1/2020. So for 2019, she is eligible for the 401(k) portion of the plan. She is actively employed on the last day of the plan year so she is entitled to the TH minimum allocation.
"The issue: based on her data and the fact that the 401(k) portion uses an elapsed time methodology for eligibility, I believe that she would be a statutory employee. She has met age 21 and she has met a YOS, on an elapsed time basis, on 9/26/2018. Based on the statutory entry dates, she would be a statutory employee as of 1/1/2019. Do you agree?
"Under the assumption that she is a statutory employee, she is now required to receive the minimum gateway contribution. If this is correct and she does receive it, she will have a high EBAR and cause the testing to go from failing to passing. Does anyone see any issue with this?
"If the
allocation changes and the testing then fails, I cannot provide her with an additional contribution that would cause her to get something above the gateway as she is not entitled to it. Agree?
"Finally, the plan calls for compensation while a participant in the plan, so what should her comp be for minimum gateway purposes? Because she received the TH min, should it be her 415 compensation? If not, what should it be, because she has no compensation defined for the profit sharing portion of the plan since she is not eligible."