Get the Message Boards Digest by Email
BenefitsLink.com logo   

BenefitsLink® Message Boards Digest

July 30, 2024

Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink® Message Boards

Santo Gold created a topic in Correction of Plan Defects

Correcting Missed Deferral Opportunity: Vesting of Match Contribution

"A 401k plan is going through the correction program to make amends for not giving quite a few individuals the opportunity to make 401k contributions. When calculating the associated match on the MDO, is it required that the match be 100% vested even if the plan uses a 6 year graded match vesting schedule?"

No replies yet   |    Click Here to Add a Reply
[Sponsored]

Retirement Plan Services Continue to Navigate the Regulatory Landscape

Sponsored by Enterprise Iron
Feeling overwhelmed by legislative changes? Looking for solutions to reduce workload due to regulatory changes? Our Compliance Team maximizes efficiency and cost-savings. Seamlessly integrate with tailored solutions for your business! Explore Now!

AlbanyConsultant created a topic in Retirement Plans in General

Showing Pooled Plan Fees (Or Not) on Participant Statements

"I've got a pooled plan where the plan sponsor doesn't want to show the investment fees separately from other gains/losses. He says that it's net gains that matters -- if the net is better than 'average', then the participants are fine. He is fine with it showing on the SAR, and he is happy to tell his participants that the fees on the SAR are net against the total gains on their statement. That isn't sitting well with me. I'd think that in a pooled plan, the disclosure standard is even higher since all the assets are controlled by the trustee. The fact that there are lawsuits about fees seems to indicate that disclosing fees so they can be monitored is the right thing to do. So my question is, is there something in black and white that supports either side?"

2 replies so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Jakyasar created a topic in Retirement Plans in General

Reasonable DB Plan NRA for a Boxer

"I am looking into a DB plan design for a professional boxer and researching what a reasonable NRA is for a new DB plan. Currently, age is mid 20s. I looked online and on average, it is age 37. Some retire in the 20s, early to late thirties. On very exceptional situations, past 40. So, using NRA of 35-37 seems reasonable with a 10 YOP for a DB plan. Apparently planning to retire within 5 to 7 years. Any comments?"

6 replies so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Jakyasar created a topic in Retirement Plans in General

Testing Age

"Having a discussion with someone about SSRA as testing age. I do not believe it can be used as it is not a uniform testing age and nowhere it says it is ok, at least from what I have been checking. Per EOB, non-discrimination answer book and other sources, if there is no uniformity then use 65, nowhere it said it is ok testing using SSRA ages. What say you?"

1 reply so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Here are the most recently posted jobs on EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com,® a service of BenefitsLink®

View job as Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant  View details

Loren D. Stark Company
Remote

View job as Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant for Loren D. Stark Company
►View More Jobs

►Post a Job

►Get Instant Job Alerts

BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
56 Creeksong Road
Whittier NC 28789
(407) 644-4146

Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher

Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We were not involved in the production of such links and are not responsible for their content.

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy