"The circumstances are that this is 401(k) Plan in transition from one TPA/RK to another. At the previous TPA/RK each individual had a separate account, while at the new TPA/RK there is a core account in which investments are pooled, daily valued with individual balances tracked by RK -- the individual accounts (which function the same as a brokerage portal at the custodian). Functionally, each individual had a brokerage portal
with the custodian that are then all associated with the Plan's master Trust Account -- now that is one investment option available for them, or they can invest in mutual funds in the main account.
"During the transition period, an EE entered the Plan; the prior RK would not establish an individual account for this EE, as the Plan was deconverting, and the receiving RK was unable to create an account for them as the
master Trust Account & associated individual accounts were not yet registered to the new RK. There was a 'master' Trust Account in the Plan that the deposits flow into and are then transferred to each individuals account accordingly; these are actually separate accounts.
"Because the ER was not able to get an individual account opened for this individual, their deposits were sent to the master Trust Account and sat
there in cash, uninvested. AFAIK this was not an interest bearing account. Once the transition was completed, the individual completed enrollment including setting an investment allocation and the funds were then invested according to their allocation in the core account.
"My understanding is that since the deferrals were segregated from the ER's general accounts and deposited in the Trust Account albeit uninvested, they were
not considered late deposits. The issue posed by that is potential liability due to a fiduciary breach.
- The question at hand is if the ER can allocate lost earnings for this participant for the period they were unable to direct their investments. The ER would like to do so, calculated according to the VFCP calculator.
- Would depositing lost earnings mitigate their potential liability, if permissible?'