Get the Message Boards Digest by Email
BenefitsLink.com logo   

BenefitsLink® Message Boards Digest

February 11, 2025

Here are the most recently added topics on the BenefitsLink® Message Boards

NewBieHere created a topic in SEP, SARSEP and SIMPLE Plans

SEP and Combo

"A prospective client wants to adopt 401K/PS/Cash Balance combo for the 2024 plan year. However, they already made the SEP contributions for the 2024 plan year. Is it possible for them to adopt the combo strategy? If so, how does the NDT work with the SEP contributions? Where can I find more information on this?"

1 reply so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply
[Sponsored]

Pensions on Peachtree April 24-25, 2025 – Registration is Open

Sponsored by Ferenczy Benefits Law Center
Ferenczy Benefits Law Center presents the Pensions on Peachtree (POP) Conference on April 24-25, 2025, in vibrant, Atlanta, GA. Connect with industry leaders & peers in a collaborative & engaging environment. Limited Spaces – Register Now!

gc@chimentowebb.com created a topic in 401(k) Plans

Employer Missed a Roth Deferral

"The NHCE elected to make a $5,000 Roth deferral. Pay was not reduced and no deferral (Roth or pre-tax) was made at all. The only EPCRS correction I see is for the employer to make a 40% pretax contribution, with earnings, to a QNEC. The employer and employee would like to do more. [1] contribute the 40%, with earnings, to an employee Roth account [2] and amend the 2024 W-2 to include the 40% with earnings. The IRS website (not EPCRS) allows retroactive characterization if a deferral had been made but incorrectly designated as non-Roth. However, I don't see anything in EPCRS that would allow this for an employer QNEC. I'm inclined to tell the client to act in good faith but it would be nice to know if there is more creative guidance for this issue than making a 40% pre-tax QNEC."

7 replies so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

t.haley created a topic in Correction of Plan Defects

Correction of 457b Error in Distribution

"Participant in a non-governmental 457(b) plan incurred a severance from employment and elected to defer distribution of his account (as allowed under the plan document). The participant was subsequently rehired a few weeks later and continued his participation in the plan. When the deferred distribution date arrived (2 years later) the recordkeeper failed to segregate the participant's contributions (based on first period of employment and second period of employment) and distributed his entire account, including deferrals made after he was rehired. Participant is still employed. Was the participant entitled to receive the distribution of his account attributable to deferrals in his first period of employment (because he did have a severance from employment and elected a deferred distribution date)? If so, can we treat the distribution of the deferrals made during his subsequent re-employment as an "overpayment" and apply the correction method for overpayments in EPCRS to correct (knowing that 457(b) plans are not included in EPCRS)?"

No replies yet   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

30Rock created a topic in 401(k) Plans

Plan Termination and Forfeitures

"If a 401k plan is terminating for example as of 5/31/25, all account balances are required to become 100% vested. But when do the remaining forfeitures have to be reallocated -- is it as of 5/31 or can forfeitures remain after this date to pay expenses such as mailing fees, etc. It seems like they should go to participant accounts as of the termination date?"

3 replies so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

youngbenefitslawyer created a topic in 401(k) Plans

SECURE 2.0 Roth Treatment of Catch-Up Contributions

"Will the compensation threshold of $145,000 be increased? In other words, do we know what the indexed amount will be at that date or will it be $145,000 and indexed moving forward after 1/1/2026."

3 replies so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Belgarath created a topic in Form 5500

Plan Merger Reporting

"Let's say a plan merges (into a PEP) on October 2, 2024. But the assets aren't liquidated until October 12, and not actually 'transferred' until 3 days later -- October 15.. Now, my understanding has always been that the technical 'last day' of the plan year is the effective date of the merger agreement. That is (arguably, depending upon who you are dealing with) the day that the assets 'belong' to the new plan, even though the technical transfer doesn't take place until somewhat later. But the auditor wants to see the date of the 'final' as being the date of the physical transfer of the fund, therefore showing a balance of zero as of (in this example) October 15th. Is there really any problem with just showing the final date of the form as October 15th? Seems like it'll keep everyone happy and have no real effect on anything?"

1 reply so far   |    Click Here to Add a Reply

Here are the most recently posted jobs on EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com,® a service of BenefitsLink®

View job as Experienced Combo Plan Administrator

Experienced Combo Plan Administrator  View details

Benefit Associates, Inc.
Remote / Huntington Beach CA / NY

View job as Experienced Combo Plan Administrator for Benefit Associates, Inc.
View job as 401(k) Plan Administrator Trainee/Assistant

401(k) Plan Administrator Trainee/Assistant  View details

Southern Pension Services
Tampa FL

View job as 401(k) Plan Administrator Trainee/Assistant for Southern Pension Services
View job as Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Plan Administrator  View details

Southern Pension Services
Tampa FL

View job as Retirement Plan Administrator for Southern Pension Services
View job as Product Support Specialist – General Support

Product Support Specialist – General Support  View details

ftwilliam.com
Remote / Huntsville AL

View job as Product Support Specialist – General Support for ftwilliam.com
►View More Jobs

►Post a Job

►Get Instant Job Alerts

BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
(407) 644-4146

Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher

Copyright 2025 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this mailing are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We were not involved in the production of such links and are not responsible for their content.

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy