The Case Against Stock in Public Pension Funds (PDF)

Featured Jobs

ERISA & Employee Benefit Specialist / Paralegal (New York NY)

Pension Practice Director (Louisville KY / Telecommute)

Retirement Plan Administrator (Kennett Square PA)

NQ Client Services Manager (Lake Mary FL / Dallas TX)

Senior Qualified Plan Administrator (Miamisburg OH)

Regional Sales Vice President, Outside Retirement Sales Consultant (Marlton NJ / Telecommute)

Compliance Manager (Ponte Vedra Beach FL)

Compliance Administrator III (Chico CA / Telecommute)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

<< Previous news item | Next news item >>

10/22/2004: The Case Against Stock in Public Pension Funds (PDF) (Pension Research Council, The Wharton School of The University of Pennsylvania)

18 pages. Excerpt: A government has $1 million of stock in a pension fund that covers its employees. The liability can be matched with a $1-million dedicated bond portfolio. What are the consequences of shifting the pension fund from equities to bonds? The paragraph above duplicates the opening paragraph of The Case Against Stock in Corporate Pension Funds (Bader 2003), except that we have substituted a governmental plan for a corporate plan. Does this substitution matter?

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).

An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).