Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Experienced 401k Plan Administrator / Consultant

Farmer & Betts, Inc.
(Tacoma WA / Tualatin OR / Littleton CO)
Executive Director

Employers Council on Flexible Compensation (ECFC)
(Washington DC / Telecommute)
MEP Assistant Team Leader

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Houston TX / Dallas TX / Austin TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
Employee Benefits (ERISA) Associate Attorney

Stinson LLP
(Kansas City MO / Minneapolis MN)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Excerpt: Finding no legally sufficient agreement to support retirees' claims of entitlement to life-time retiree benefits, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court ruling granting summary judgment for the employer, permitting the employer to unilaterally require retirees to pay a portion of premiums for future health care. [Barnett v. Ameren, CA7, 05-1496, 2/8/06]
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.