Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Lebanon NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Senior Plan Consultant

Jocelyn Pension Consulting
(Telecommute / San Rafael CA / Boulder CO)

Jocelyn Pension Consulting logo

Retirement Plan Account Manager

The Partners Group
(Telecommute / Portland OR)

The Partners Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Telecommute)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

SPS
(Telecommute)

SPS logo

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Health Plans Inc
(Westborough MA)

Health Plans Inc logo

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Challenge to Factual Basis Set Forth in Removal Notice Rejected
Health Plan Law Link to more items from this source
Dec. 12, 2006
Excerpt: The recent case of Sumter Regional v. Patten Seed raises the question of what facts must be asserted to support removal of a putative ERISA case to federal court. While the complete preemption doctrine undoubtedly permits removal of an ERISA case notwithstanding the wording of the complaint, what facts must be alleged to invoke federal question jurisdiction?

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.