Regional Vice President of Sales The Retirement Plan Company
|
AimPoint Pension
|
Bates & Company, Inc.
|
Compass
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Loan & Distribution Specialist AimPoint Pension
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Supreme Court Decides that Title VII Mixed-Motives Analysis Does Not Apply to Age Discrimination Claims
Littler [Guidance Overview] June 24, 2009
Excerpt: The U.S. Supreme Court in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., No. 08-441 (June 18, 2009) has held that the burden-shifting analysis that is available in so-called mixed-motives cases under Title VII does not apply to claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Rather, the Court held that a plaintiff bringing a disparate treatment claim under the ADEA bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his or her age was the 'but-for' cause of the challenged adverse employment action. In other words, even if there is some evidence that age was a factor in the challenged employment decision, the plaintiff cannot prevail unless he or she can prove that, but for his or her age, the employer would not have taken the challenged action.
|
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |