Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Relationship Manager

ERISA Services, Inc.
(Remote)

ERISA Services, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping

T Bank N.A.
(Dallas TX)

T Bank N.A. logo

Retirement Account Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Solutions Specialists
(Remote / Jacksonville FL / Hybrid)

Retirement Solutions Specialists logo

Regional Sales Director (West)

July Business Services
(CA)

July Business Services logo

Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

TPA Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
(Remote)

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS) logo

Client Service Manager

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Compliance Officer

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Citigroup 401(k) Participant Lawsuit Dismissed
Business Insurance; free registration required Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Sept. 1, 2009
Excerpt: A federal judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of 150,000 participants in Citigroup's two 401(k) plans, saying the company's inclusion of company stock as an investment option did not violate its fiduciary duties under ERISA. U.S. District Court Judge Sidney H. Stein in New York tossed out the lawsuit, filed on behalf of participants in Citigroup's 401(k) Plan and the Citibuilder 401(k) Plan for Puerto Rico. 'Investment in Citigroup stock was presumptively prudent, and plaintiffs have failed to allege facts in support of a possible claim to overcome that assumption,' Judge Stein wrote in his ruling. Judge Stein added that the two 401(k) plans 'unequivocally required' that Citigroup stock be offered as an investment option, and thus 'had no discretion and could not be acting as fiduciaries' with respect to the plans' investment in company stock. According to the ruling, the inclusion of the company stock was mandated in the terms of the plans.

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.