Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Display and Distribute
Your Job Openings
COVID-19 News
COVID-19 Webcasts

Featured Jobs

Actuarial Consultant

Definiti-LLC
(Telecommute / University Place WA / The Woodlands TX / Erie PA / Dallas TX)

Definiti-LLC logo

Qualified Plan Administrator

Clark Schaefer Hackett
(Cincinnati OH / Miamisburg OH / Columbus OH)

Clark Schaefer Hackett logo

Pension Administrator

KB Pension Services
(Telecommute / Bradenton FL)

KB Pension Services logo

Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division

Internal Revenue Service [IRS]
(Telecommute / Washington DC)

Internal Revenue Service [IRS] logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Definiti
(Telecommute / Dallas TX / University Place WA / The Woodlands TX)

Definiti logo

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Text of Seventh Circuit Opinion Finding ACA Contraceptive Mandate Violates Religious Rights of Closely-Held Corporations (PDF)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Link to more items from this source
Nov. 10, 2013
[154 pages.] "Compelling a person to do an act his religion forbids, or punishing him for an act his religion requires, are paradigmatic religious-liberty injuries ... A corporation is just a special form of organizational association. No one doubts that organizational associations can engage in religious practice. The government accepts that some corporations -- religious nonprofits -- have religious-exercise rights under both RFRA and the Free-Exercise Clause. As evidence of this, the contraception mandate exempts a class of religious organizations -- i.e., churches and their integrated auxiliaries ... whether or not they conduct their activities in the corporate form.... [We] take it as both conceded and noncontroversial that the use of the corporate form and the associated legal attributes of that status -- think separate legal personhood, limitations on owners' liability, special tax treatment -- do not disable an organization from engaging in the exercise of religion within the meaning of RFRA (or the Free Exercise Clause, for that matter).... If Congress intended a nonprofit limitation in RFRA, surely there would be some hint of it in the statutory text." [Korte et al. v. Sebelius, No.12-3841, consolidated with Grote v. Sebelius, No. 13-1077 (7th Cir. Nov. 8, 2013)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.