Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Defined Contribution Account Manager
Nova 401(k) Associates logo
Nova 401(k) Associates
(Houston TX / Dallas TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
ESOP Valuation Writer
Unique ESOP Valuation Provider

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>

Frommert v. Conkright 'Actuarial Heresy' Is Back Again
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP Link to more items from this source
Jan. 5, 2014
"[The case] has been remanded to the district court, for consideration of what equitable relief might be available under Section 502(a)(3). If it finds no equitable remedy, it is to determine what interpretation of the plan is reasonable. This two-step approach suggests that 'notice provisions' refers not only to Section 102 SPD content requirements, but also to Section 204(h) notices to applicable individuals prior to an amendment to reduce their future benefit accruals." [Frommert v. Conkright, No. 12-67-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 23, 2013)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020, Inc.