Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

ESOP Valuation Writer
Unique ESOP Valuation Provider
(Telecommute)
Enrolled Actuary
Loren D. Stark Company logo
Loren D. Stark Company
(Telecommute)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Unmarried Employee Not Entitled to FMLA Leave to Care for Hospitalized Partner or Unborn Child
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business Link to more items from this source
Mar. 19, 2014
"Under the FMLA, a wife is included in the meaning of the word 'spouse' but whether or not the employee's partner was his wife was a matter of state law. Kentucky, however, did not recognize common-law marriages. Therefore, the employee's partner was not his 'spouse' for purposes of the FMLA.... Further, the employee was not entitled to FMLA leave in order to care for his son because his termination came one week before his son was born. It was 'impossible' for the employee to be entitled to leave for the birth of his son and to care for that son when the child had not been born." [Lukudu v. JBS USA, LLC, NO. 3:12-C V-00704-TBR (W.D. Ky. Mar. 14, 2014)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.