Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Defined Contribution Account Manager
Nova 401(k) Associates logo
Nova 401(k) Associates
(Houston TX / Dallas TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
Retirement Plan Processor
T Bank NA logo
T Bank NA
(Dallas TX)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Employer's Proposed Changes in Funding Retiree Health Care Benefits Was Not What Parties Bargained For, Sixth Circuit Says
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business Link to more items from this source
May 16, 2014
"An employer's unilateral implementation of individual health reimbursement accounts (HRAs) in place of group health care plans breached the parties' collective bargaining agreements, not because they were 'unreasonable,' but because they were not what the parties bargained for ... [T]he Sixth Circuit found [the collective bargaining agreement] language unambiguous and that it created a vested lifetime right to health care benefits. Upon retirement, the retirees all had company-provided group health insurance coverage, with the employer paying the full premium for that insurance. The HRAs are not company-provided group insurance; they are health care vouchers. They also shifted significant risks from the company to the retirees."

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.