Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Enrolled Actuary
Loren D. Stark Company logo
Loren D. Stark Company
(Telecommute)
ESOP Valuation Writer
Unique ESOP Valuation Provider
(Telecommute)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



'Church Plan' Challengers in Colorado May Win
Bloomberg BNA Link to more items from this source
July 17, 2014
"Siding with two federal courts and disagreeing with a third, Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix's July 9 report and recommendation looked to the 'unambiguous language' of [ERISA's] church plan exemption to conclude that the plan wasn't a church plan because it wasn't 'established and maintained by a church.' The magistrate also ... rejected Catholic Health's argument that it was entitled to a 'correction period' in which to satisfy the requirements of the church plan exemption, finding that such a correction period applied only to plans established by churches." [Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives, No. 1:13-cv-01249-REB-KLM (D. Colo. July 9, 2014)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.