Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Client Success Team Leader

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA / AL / AZ / CO / DC / FL / IL / KY / LA / MA / NC / NJ / NV / NY / OR / SC / TN / TX / WA)

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

SPS
(Telecommute)

SPS logo

Implementation Specialist

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(San Francisco CA / AL / AZ / CO / DC / FL / IL / KY / LA / MA / NC / NJ / NV / NY / OR / SC / TN / TX / WA)

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings logo

New Business Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Telecommute / CO / IA / IL / IN / KS / MN / MO / ND / NE / OH / OK / SD / WI / WY)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC
(Lebanon NJ)

Steidle Pension Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Group RHI
(Telecommute / Spring TX / Dallas TX / University Place WA)

Group RHI logo

Director of Regulatory Affairs

Health Plans Inc
(Westborough MA)

Health Plans Inc logo

Defined Contribution Plan Administrator

MGKS
(Phoenix AZ)

MGKS logo

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Ninth Circuit Upholds 'Right to Control' as Primary Test of Independent Contractor or Employee Status
Kilpatrick Townsend Link to more items from this source
Sept. 1, 2014
"The court held that the primary factor in determining whether a worker is an independent contractor or employee in California is the right to control the manner or means by which a result is obtained, regardless of whether that right is exercised. The court found the evidence overwhelmingly established that FedEx Ground retained the right to control the manner and means by which the work was performed. While drivers might have been permitted limited freedom to make certain decisions in performing the work, FedEx Ground retained all necessary control over the drivers." [Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., No. 12-17458 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2014) and Slayman v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., No. 12-35525 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2014)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.