Coronavirus (COVID-19) News and Resources
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Webcasts
Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Enrolled Actuary
Loren D. Stark Company logo
Loren D. Stark Company
ESOP Valuation Writer
Unique ESOP Valuation Provider

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>

Ninth Circuit Joins First Circuit in Finding That Elimination of a Pension Transfer Option Does Not Violate ERISA Anti-Cutback Rule
Littler Link to more items from this source
Oct. 7, 2014
"The Ninth Circuit employed the reasoning found in the U.S. Government's amicus brief, concluding that there was no violation because the 2004 Amendment did not result in a reduction of the plaintiffs' 'accrued benefit' in the Profit Sharing Plan.... Although transfer from a profit sharing plan is an optional form of benefit, that aspect was not modified by the 2004 Amendment.... Only acceptance [of transfers] by the Retirement Income Plan was prohibited. Despite affirming the district court's dismissal, the Ninth Circuit expressed that it was 'deeply troubled' with this 'disturbing' result." [Andersen v. DHL Retirement Pension Plan, No. 12-36051 (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2014)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020, Inc.