Nova 401(k) Associates |
Nicholas Pension Consultants |
Carpenter Morse Group |
Retirement, LLC |
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc. |
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra |
United 401(k) Plans, Inc. |
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Bates & Company |
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc. |
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc. |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Prime Pensions, Inc. |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
Supreme Court Rejects Presumption of Vesting of Retiree Welfare Benefits Sidley Austin LLP ![]() Jan. 27, 2015 "The Court held that although a court may look to known customs or usages in a particular industry to determine the meaning of a contract, the court may not rely on its own unsupported suppositions. Instead, the parties must prove those customs or usages with actual evidence." [M&G Polymers v. Tackett, No. 13-1010 (U.S. Jan. 26, 2015)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |