Carpenter Morse Group |
Retirement, LLC |
Nova 401(k) Associates |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc. |
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra |
Prime Pensions, Inc. |
United 401(k) Plans, Inc. |
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc. |
Bates & Company |
Nicholas Pension Consultants |
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc. |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
King v. Burwell: Congressional Intent and the Statutory Language Are Aligned Ron Pollack, in Health Affairs Forefront ![]() [Opinion] Feb. 5, 2015 "Some believe the King lawsuit is a contest between, on the one hand, congressional intent that premium subsidies should be provided in all states, versus, on the other hand, statutory language that says the opposite. Those who believe this formulation are half right: they are correct that Congress clearly intended subsidies to be provided to moderate-income families irrespective of whether their state of residence chose to run its marketplace directly instead of leaving it to the federal government; however, they are mistaken about the ACA's language, which equally clearly indicates that subsidies should be provided in all states." |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |