Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)

RPA
(Remote)

RPA logo

Education Consultant

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Unpacking the Supreme Court Oral Arguments in King v. Burwell
Timothy Jost, in Health Affairs ForefrontLink to more items from this source
Mar. 5, 2015

"The argument was supposed to last an hour, but in fact went on for almost an hour and a half. It is a masterpiece -- two highly competent counsel thoroughly in control of their arguments being grilled by Justices who had obviously read the briefs, thought about the issues, and prepared themselves to ask probing and difficult questions.... Justice Alito ... asked the central question in the litigation: If Congress meant to empower federal exchanges to grant tax credits, why did it use the phrase 'established by the State,' rather than 'established under the Act,' or 'established within the State'? Why not say that a federally facilitated exchange is a state exchange? General Verrilli responded by saying that the statute in fact says 'established by the State under section 1311,' and that 1311 includes federal exchanges."

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.