Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Relationship Manager/Consultant

The Retirement Plan Company (TRPC)/an ABG firm

The Retirement Plan Company (TRPC)/an ABG firm logo

Retirement Plan Analyst/Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote / Beaumont TX)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

ERISA Counsel

Human Interest

Human Interest logo

Quality Assurance Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Plan Quality Assurance

ERISA Services, Inc.
(Remote / Knoxville TN)

ERISA Services, Inc. logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Atlantic Pension Services Inc
(Remote / Kennett Square PA / DE / MD / NJ)

Atlantic Pension Services Inc logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / Corona CA / Rancho Cordova CA)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

Pension Administrator

Creative Pension Consultants, Inc.
(Remote / Albany NY)

Creative Pension Consultants, Inc. logo

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)


RPA logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>

Seventh Circuit: Disputed Benefit Calculation Without Explanation Is Arbitrary and Capricious (PDF)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitLink to more items from this source
May 12, 2015

"The district court found Continental's 2012 decision to be arbitrary and capricious because it is not based on the Plan's definition of 'compensation' -- at least is not demonstrably based on that definition.... No matter how many times Continental rattles off the phrase 'benefit salary' -- which it has done an awful lot -- this is not an explanation of the 2012 decision because it leaves everyone in the dark about how Reilly's qualifying compensation was calculated. An explanation-free decision is arbitrary and capricious.... The court needed to determine (or allow the administrator to determine) the right number, not just to assume that whatever had been estimated in 1999 is Reilly's entitlement.... The district court's decision cannot stand, because Reilly has not tried to show that $5,400 is the only possible outcome of a proper calculation process." [Reilly v. Continental Casualty Co., No. 14-2888 (7th Cir. May 6, 2015)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022, Inc.