EPIC Retirement Plan Services |
Retirement Plan Solutions, Inc. |
Defined Contributions Consultant LDSCO |
Pentegra |
Healthcare Actuarial Consultant BPAS |
Plan Design Consultants, Inc. |
Retirement Plan Sales Consultant Primark Benefits |
Nova 401(k) Associates |
AimPoint Pension Group |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
EEOC Proposed Regs Require a Gut Check for Wellness Programs (PDF) Alston & Bird LLP ![]() [Guidance Overview] May 12, 2015 "The EEOC stated in Footnote 24 of the proposed regulations that it 'does not believe' that the bona fide benefit plan safe harbor 'is the proper basis for finding wellness program incentives permissible.' ... With this shot across the bow, the EEOC has made it clear that it does not agree with courts -- such as the court in [Seff v. Broward County] -- that have applied the bona fide benefit plan safe harbor to incentive-based wellness programs. How a court would weigh this guidance, in view of contrary precedent in some federal circuits, remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the EEOC has not ceded the litigation position taken in Seff and Honeywell." |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |