Featured Jobs
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Bates & Company
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Prime Pensions, Inc.
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
|
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| Tibble v. Edison Decision Sidesteps Numerous Questions Jackson Lewis P.C.  May 19, 2015 "Given that the Court emphasized a wholly separate duty applicable to investment practices -- i.e., a well-established duty to monitor investments -- it does appear that the Court opted not to recognize any continuing-violation doctrine. Similarly, given the Court's focus on the Uniform Prudent Investors Act, the application of Tibble should be limited to imprudent-investment claims, where there is a clearly established, ongoing duty to monitor, or at least those species of fiduciary claims where there is recognized duty of an ongoing nature." [Tibble v. Edison Int'l, No. 13-550 (U.S. May 18, 2015)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
