Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
Nova 401(k) Associates
Nicholas Pension Consultants
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|Tibble v. Edison Decision Sidesteps Numerous Questions|
Jackson Lewis P.C.
May 19, 2015
"Given that the Court emphasized a wholly separate duty applicable to investment practices -- i.e., a well-established duty to monitor investments -- it does appear that the Court opted not to recognize any continuing-violation doctrine. Similarly, given the Court's focus on the Uniform Prudent Investors Act, the application of Tibble should be limited to imprudent-investment claims, where there is a clearly established, ongoing duty to monitor, or at least those species of fiduciary claims where there is recognized duty of an ongoing nature." [Tibble v. Edison Int'l, No. 13-550 (U.S. May 18, 2015)]
|Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).|
|An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).|