Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Senior Defined Benefits Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company logo

Pension Consultant

Randall & Hurley, Inc.
(Remote / Liberty Lake WA / Helena MT)

Randall & Hurley, Inc. logo

Education Consultant

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC Retirement Plan Services
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC Retirement Plan Services logo

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)

RPA
(Remote)

RPA logo

Retirement Plan Administrator - Senior Associate

PBMares
(Norfolk VA)

PBMares logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Excellent TPA
(Remote)

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Text of Supreme Court Opinion: ACA Subsidies Upheld for Insurance Purchased on Federally-Facilitated Exchanges (PDF)
Supreme Court of the United StatesLink to more items from this source
June 25, 2015

"When read in context, the phrase 'an Exchange established by the State under [42 U.S.C. Section 18031]' is properly viewed as ambiguous. The phrase may be limited in its reach to State Exchanges. But it could also refer to all Exchanges -- both State and Federal -- for purposes of the tax credits.... The argument that the phrase 'established by the State' would be superfluous if Congress meant to extend tax credits to both State and Federal Exchanges is unpersuasive.... [T]he statutory scheme compels the Court to reject petitioners' interpretation because it would destabilize the individual insurance market in any State with a Federal Exchange, and likely create the very 'death spirals' that Congress designed the Act to avoid.... Petitioners' plain-meaning arguments are strong, but the Act's context and structure compel the conclusion that Section 36B allows tax credits for insurance purchased on any Exchange created under the Act. Those credits are necessary for the Federal Exchanges to function like their State Exchange counterparts, and to avoid the type of calamitous result that Congress plainly meant to avoid." [King v. Burwell, No. 14-114 (U.S. June 25, 2015)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.