Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Education Consultant

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Quality Assurance Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / Corona CA / Rancho Cordova CA)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Analyst/Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote / Beaumont TX)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Sixth Circuit Rules Plan Terms Are 'Irrelevant' When Considering Equitable Claim
Robinson + Cole LLPLink to more items from this source
June 28, 2015

"The decision makes abundantly clear that the Sixth Circuit requires a plan sponsor to toe a very fine line, because it must simplify and summarize complex plan language in an SPD, but it can be strictly liable if its summary fails to include any term that a court later decides was material to a subsequent dispute ... Any provision in a Plan could be material to some benefit dispute that arises in the future." [Pearce v. Chrysler Group, LLC Pension Plan, No. 13-2374 (6th Cir. June 18, 2015; unpub.)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.