Benefit Associates, Inc. |
Nicholas Pension Consultants |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Nova 401(k) Associates |
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra |
Prime Pensions, Inc. |
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation |
Bates & Company |
United 401(k) Plans, Inc. |
Carpenter Morse Group |
DPS Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC Retirement Plan Services |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Retirement, LLC |
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc. |
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc. |
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc. |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
Pending Supreme Court Case Carries Implications for ERISA Class Actions Seyfarth Shaw LLP ![]() Sept. 18, 2015 "Many courts do not now require that a class definition exclude the possibility that a class member suffers no injury.... A Tyson win therefore could mean that a putative ERISA class challenging a defective Summary Plan Description that applied to a class of plan participants will not be certified unless class counsel can trace the defect, in roadmap fashion, to a common injury for each class member. It could mean that a putative ERISA class challenging allegedly excessive fees for a plan investment in a defined contribution plan will not be certified unless class counsel can show how each class member will receive a common increase in benefits should the claim succeed." [Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, No. 14-1146 (8th Cir. Aug. 25, 2014; cert. pet. granted June 8, 2015)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |