Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Fee Allocation: Which Methodology is Best for Your Plan?
Cammack Retirement Group Nov. 15, 2016 "Once it has been determined that the fees in the plan are reasonable, the next issue plan sponsors must tackle is how to allocate those fees. In most cases, the participants ... share the majority, if not all, of the plan fees. An issue over which plan sponsors are showing greater concern is whether these participant fees should be calculated based on a percentage of assets (and allocated pro rata) or whether all participants should be assessed the same flat dollar fee (i.e., per capita)." |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |