Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Bates & Company, Inc.
|
Regional Vice President of Sales The Retirement Plan Company
|
Compass
|
AimPoint Pension
|
Loan & Distribution Specialist AimPoint Pension
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
ERISA's Anti-Retaliation Provision: An Overview of Section 510
Katz Marshall and Banks LLP, Via Lexology Nov. 28, 2016
"A plaintiff must show that the alleged discrimination was intended either [1] to retaliate against the plaintiff for the exercise of a right, or [2] to interfere with the attainment of an entitled (i.e., vested) right. A plaintiff must show that the employer acted with the specific intent to violate the statute and to retaliate against the employee or interfere with an employee's ERISA rights."
|
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |