Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Assistant Team Leader

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Houston TX / Austin TX / Dallas TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
DC Plan Administrator

San Diego Pension Consultants
(San Diego CA)
Compliance Analyst (QKA)

Newport Group
(Folsom CA / Dallas TX / Walnut Creek CA / Annapolis MD / Burlington VT / Charlotte NC / Chicago IL / Fresno CA / Moline IL / Lake Mary FL / Saint Petersburg FL / Saint Louis MO / AL / IA / MN / PA / VA / WI)
Retirement Plan Relationship Advisor

Prosperity Advisors, LLC and SS&G Wealth Management
(Akron OH)
Apprentice - Financial Services and Employee Benefits

Columbia Benefits, LLC
(Englewood CO)
DC 401(k) Plan Administrator

Gelman Pension Consulting, Inc.
(New York NY)
Senior Pension Administrator
Spectra Associates
(PA)
Retirement Plan Advisor / Relationship Manager
Growing Regional Bank
(Houston TX)
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

Goldberg, Swedelson & Associates
(Encino CA / Telecommute)
Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

AimPoint Pension
(Telecommute)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



"In support of their request for a stay, the defendants also noted that the Trump administration has indicated that it will modify or eliminate the challenged regulations. In denying the motion for a stay, the district court concluded: [1] The participants' claims relied on the Section 1557 statute itself, rather than the Section 1557 final regulations.... [2] A stay would not simplify the issues in question or reduce the parties' litigation burden.... The participants in this litigation also appear to have contemplated new regulations in the 1557 space, and argued that their claims are based on the Section 1557 statute and therefore would not 'rise and fall' with the existence or enforceability of the current Section 1557 regulations." [Boyden v. Conlin, No. 17-264 (W.D. Wis. May 11, 2018)]
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2020 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.