New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Participant Is Entitled to Deferred Compensation Benefits Despite Termination for Refusal to Transfer Positions
Michelle L. Roberts, via LinkedIn July 23, 2018 "Defendants argued that Peck was an at-will employee without any employment contract assigning him to a specific position or specific duties so the company could direct him to perform whatever duties it chooses. Thus, his refusal to accept the new position constitutes a 'refusal to perform' the 'material duties and obligations' of his employment. The Court determined that Defendant's interpretation of the Plan is incorrect because it is incompatible with the terms of the Plan and 'upsets the parties' reasonable expectations about the duties of a person's employment with the company.' It would require an at-will employee's 'material duties and obligations' to be completely unconnected to his or her current position." [Peck v. SELEX Systems Integration, Inc., No. 17-7138 (D.C. Cir. July 17, 2018)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |