Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Pollard & Associates
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Transcript of Supreme Court Oral Argument in Case Challenging ACA (PDF)
Supreme Court of the United States Nov. 11, 2020 135-page transcript of oral argument, held Nov. 10, 2020, on issues of standing and severability. "Justice Alito [to Acting U.S. Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall]: At the time of the first case [NFIB v. Sebelius], there was strong reason to believe that the individual mandate was like a part in an airplane that was essential to keep the plane flying so that if that part was taken out, the plane would crash. But now the part has been taken out and the plane has not crashed. So if we were to decide this case the way you advocate, how would we explain why the individual mandate in its present form is essential to the operation of the Act?" Also available: audio recording (MP3). [California v. Texas, No. 19-840; Texas v. California, No. 19-1019 (cert. pet. granted Mar. 2, 2020)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |