Nova 401(k) Associates |
Retirement Plan Solutions, Inc. |
Defined Contributions Consultant LDSCO |
Plan Design Consultants, Inc. |
Healthcare Actuarial Consultant BPAS |
Pentegra |
Retirement Plan Sales Consultant Primark Benefits |
IUOE Local No. 478 Employee Benefit Funds |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
LTD Plan's Failure to Define 'Active' Employee Extends Eligibility to Employee Not Actually Working Thomson Reuters / EBIA ![]() Mar. 25, 2021 "It should not be assumed that a similarity between terms ('active' vs. 'actively at work') will lead a court to conclude that the same meaning is intended for each, or that one is intended to explain the meaning of the other. Instead, it's just as likely that the court will consider undefined terms to be ambiguous and construe them against the drafter." [Carlile v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., Nos. 19-4123, 20-4005 (10th Cir. Feb. 22, 2021)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |