Featured Jobs
Retirement, LLC
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Associate Attorney Verrill
|
Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Benefit Funds |
Retirement Plan Documents Specialist Loren D. Stark Company
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
Administrator/Consultant (DC and DB) TPA Professionals |
Retirement, LLC
|
RTD Financial Advisors
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Retirement Plan Administrator (TPA) Retirement Plan Consultants
|
Jr Retirement Plan Administrator/ Administrative Assistant Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc.
|
Bates & Company
|
Pentegra
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| DOL Wants Supreme Court to Weigh In on Excessive Fee Suit Thresholds American Retirement Association [ARA]  June 9, 2021 "[T]he government cites at least two plausible claims for breach of ERISA's duty of prudence ... They noted that the Seventh Circuit had determined that because the plaintiffs had access to some low-cost investment options, they could not object to the fiduciaries' decision to offer other investment vehicles that allegedly carried unreasonably high management or recordkeeping fees -- a position inconsistent with that of the Eighth Circuit -- and apparently with that of the [DOL]." [Hughes v. Northwestern Univ., No. 18-2569 (7th Cir. Mar. 25, 2020; cert. pet. filed Jun. 19, 2020; brief for U.S. as amicus curiae filed May 25, 2021)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
