Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Fifth Circuit Is Right To Question ERISA Review Norms
DeBofsky Sherman Casciari Reynolds P.C. [Opinion] Oct. 7, 2021 "The court maintained that under a deferential standard of review, none of the plaintiff's arguments proved that the determination was arbitrary and capricious. While the court's ruling was unanimous, U.S. Circuit Judge Andy Oldham wrote a concurrence addressing the scope of review applied by the court in this case and questioning its use in other ERISA cases. What Judge Oldham wrote was an indictment of the way federal judges decide ERISA cases and has the potential to dramatically change all future ERISA litigation involving benefit claim denials." [Michael J. P. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, No. 20-30361 (5th Cir. Sep. 22, 2021; unpub.)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |