Featured Jobs
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
|
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Prime Pensions, Inc.
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
|
Bates & Company
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| Supreme Court to Decide Medicare Dialysis Case National Conference of State Legislatures [NCSL]  Nov. 19, 2021 "DaVita argues that treating dialysis benefits less favorably than other benefits violates the MSPA. Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan argues it hasn't violated the [Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSPA)] because it provides the same dialysis benefits to all plan participants and reimburses dialysis providers uniformly regardless of whether the patient has end-stage renal disease. The 6th Circuit agreed with DaVita that the health plan may have violated three provisions of the MSPA." [Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. Davita, Inc., No. 19-4039 (6th Cir. Oct. 14, 2020; cert. pet. granted Nov. 5, 2021)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
