Featured Jobs
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Bates & Company
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Prime Pensions, Inc.
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
|
United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| District Court Finds No Mental Health Parity Violation, Despite Offending Plan Provisions Thomson Reuters / EBIA  Dec. 3, 2021 "Although this case illustrates the uphill road faced by plan participants alleging MHPAEA violations, it also serves as a warning of the costly litigation expenses that a plan may face due to allegations of a parity violation -- especially when the plan's coverage standards differ between medical/surgical and mental health benefits." [Christine S. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of N.M., No. 18-874 (D. Utah Oct. 14, 2021)] |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
