Featured Jobs
|
The Pension Source
|
|
Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Retirement Combo Plan Administrator Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Merkley Retirement Consultants
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
|
|
Defined Benefit Specialist II or III Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
BPAS
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
Search the News Archive
|
1 Matching News Items |
| 1. |
Michael Doran in Labor Law Journal, via SSRN
Oct. 1, 2025
"The [Cunningham v. Cornell] ruling is badly mistaken. Because the definition of 'party in interest' includes every plan fiduciary, the Court's decision allows lawsuits for all transactions involving a plan's receipt of services, even the services mandated by ERISA. On the Court's reading of the statute, ERISA both requires that fiduciaries perform specific acts and simultaneously prohibits fiduciaries from performing those same acts." [Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007 (S.Ct. Apr. 17, 2025)]
|
|
Syntax Enhancements for Standard Searches
|