State and local governments are now permitted to establish excess benefit plans to provide benefits otherwise lost due to the benefit ceilings of section 415 of the tax code, under the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996. Public employers had long sought the ability to set up excess benefit plans, in part to maintain parity with private employers, which commonly use excess benefit plans. Meanwhile, Congress has relaxed many of the public plan section 415 ceilings themselves, in some cases eliminating the need for an excess plan.
Only CMPs that are specified by statute or regulation in dollar amounts are adjusted
under the 1990 Act, as amended. CMPs that are specified as percentages are not
adjusted. The statutory citations for each of the CMPs under Title I of ERISA that
would be adjusted by the proposed rule contained in this Notice are set forth in
columns (A) and (B) of Table A. Column (C) briefly describes the nature of the
violations associated with these citations. Column (D) of Table A indicates the dollar
amount of each CMP to be adjusted, and Column (E) sets forth the year that each penalty
was established by law or last adjusted. Columns (F), (G), and (H), (I), and (J)
contain the intermediate results of applying the series of steps mandated by the 1990
Act, as amended. [Columns (E) through (J) not shown here -- BenefitsLink editor.]
Reference should be made to Column (K) of Table A to determine the dollar amounts of
the final penalty adjustments that would be effected by the proposed rule contained in
this Notice pursuant to the requirements of the 1990 Act, as amended.
Table A.--Inflation Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties
Under Title I of ERISA
U.S. Code citation ERISA Title I Nature of Penalty amount
section violation to be adjusted Capped penalty
(A) (B) (C) (D) (K)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29 USC 209(b) Failure to $10 per $11 per
1059(b) furnish or employee employee.
maintain records.
29 USC 502(c)(1)(A) Failure to notify Up to $100 Up to $110
1132(c)(1)(A) plan a day a day.
participants of
group health
benefits under
COBRA.
Failure to notify Up to $100 Up to $110
participants and a day a day.
beneficiaries
re: asset
transfer.
29 USC 502(c)(1)(B) Refusal to Up to $100 Up to $110
1132(c)(1)(B) provide required a day a day.
info in timely
manner.
29 USC 502(c)(2) Failure or Up to $1,000 Up to $1,100
1132(c)(2) refusal to file a day a day.
an annual report.
29 USC 502(c)(3) Failure to notify Up to $100 Up to $110
1132(c)(3) participants and a day a day.
beneficiaries
re: failure to
meet minimum
funding
requirements.
Failure to notify Up to $100 Up to $110
certain persons a day a day.
re: transfer of
excess pension
assets to health
account.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains interim rules governing the content of the summary plan description (SPD) for group health plans, the furnishing of summaries of material reductions in covered services or benefits by group health plans, and the disclosure of SPD and related information through electronic media. The rules contained in this document implement amendments to the disclosure provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) enacted as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act of 1996 (NMHPA).Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the interim rules for consideration by the Department in developing final rules. * * *
EFFECTIVE DATE. This regulation is effective on June 1, 1997.
This Issue Brief examines why policymakers are concerned about the trend toward early retirement and how it relates to Social Security, Medicare, and employee health and retirement benefits. It reviews the rationale for the effects of economic incentives on early retirement decisions and includes a summary of empirical literature on the retirement process. It presents data on how employee benefits influence workers' expected retirement patterns. Finally, it examines the implications of public policies to reverse early-retirement trends and raise the eligibility age for Social Security and Medicare.
On December 24, 1996, the Internal Revenue Service issued P.L.R. 9712033 which concerned the federal income tax (including unrelated business income tax) and federal excise tax consequences of the contribution of certain stock options to a qualified plan and the subsequent exercise of those stock options to be used in the purchase of the common stock of the employer maintaining the plan. The Service is reexamining the plan qualification and other tax issues under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, raised by a contribution of stock options to a plan and subsequent exercise of those options.
Question 25: In Q&A 24, we dealt with when the remedial amendment for a new plan expires. What happens if an application for a favorable determination letter is not filed within that period and a defect in the form of the document is discovered later on? Can this be corrected under APRSC? VCR? CAP?
Welcome to Executive PayWatch -- A working families' guide to monitoring and curtailing the excessive salaries, bonuses and perks in CEO compensation packages.Most of us are working longer and harder just to get by. Not so for America's corporate elite, whose exorbitant pay schemes have created unprecedented inequities in the American workplace. Why is CEO pay getting further and further out of line? How does it affect the rest of us who work for a living? And what can be done to rein it in? Click on to find the answers.
Flex plan managers struggle every year with the appropriate pricing scheme for their plan offerings. Although this exercise is of great importance, it's also important to compare your benefits costs -- and the methods you use to fund them -- with those of other employers.To that end, Hay/Huggins' Compensation and Benefits Strategies for 1997 and Beyond contains numerous benchmarks which you can use to assess the fairness and competitiveness of what your carriers are charging.