To BenefitsLink home page           EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com is where the best employers find the best candidates!

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Want to exclude someone forever
Jim Chad
post Jul 3 2007, 11:46 AM
Post #1


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 543
Joined: 19-January 00
From: Michigan
Member No.: 3,471



I recieve a weekly excel sheet showing compensation from a payroll department. There is comp for a manufacturer's Rep who is not an employee included in it. It is very easy for us to mistake him for a commision salesman of this company and bring him into the Plan.

I want to exclude him and I can see 2 ways to do. I can either create a class or a division of "always excluded". Does anyone see a preference of one over the other?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JanetM
post Jul 5 2007, 08:36 AM
Post #2


Registered User


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 1,671
Joined: 19-December 00
From: Denver CO
Member No.: 5,950



Exclude by class - all manufacturing reps. You would not be able to benefit any other reps. You can't exclude if he is an employee. Is he really independent contractor?


--------------------
JanetM CPA, MBA
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Presson
post Jul 5 2007, 11:43 AM
Post #3


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 214
Joined: 3-December 99
From: Birmingham, AL
Member No.: 3,137



QUOTE (Jim Chad @ Jul 3 2007, 11:46 AM) *
I recieve a weekly excel sheet showing compensation from a payroll department. There is comp for a manufacturer's Rep who is not an employee included in it. It is very easy for us to mistake him for a commision salesman of this company and bring him into the Plan.

I want to exclude him and I can see 2 ways to do. I can either create a class or a division of "always excluded". Does anyone see a preference of one over the other?


You need to get the employer to stop sending you information on someone that isn't an employee.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jim Chad
post Jul 5 2007, 04:15 PM
Post #4


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 543
Joined: 19-January 00
From: Michigan
Member No.: 3,471



HI Janet: Yes. He is definitely an indepnedant contractor.

Bill, You are right, i'm trying but, I haven't succeeded yet.

For now, I am putting him in a class called excludable as if he were union, etc.

I think Relius will exclude him from testing properly. I haven't had time to check that out yet, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JanetM
post Jul 6 2007, 08:23 AM
Post #5


Registered User


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 1,671
Joined: 19-December 00
From: Denver CO
Member No.: 5,950



If the plan exclude independant contractors then you don't have to exclude you simply ignore him. He should not be in the data so you may have to make a note to delete him before you do any testing.


--------------------
JanetM CPA, MBA
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 09:26 AM