Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's doubtful you'll find an example of this particular action. However, you would be protecting the accrued benefit and in so doing preclude violating 411(d)(6). You can always freeze plans. You can always reopen plans with a different benefit formula (provided no 401(a)(4) issues in respect of grants of past service). So, you should be able to accomplish your amendment which has the joint effect. You would need to provide a 204(h) notice that explains how benefits could be reduced for participants who sustain a prolonged reduction in compensation.

If only those who drafted the plans in the first place had any notion that many employers do not maintain comprehensive employee compensation records indefinitely!

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

Not sure a 204(h) notice is required, but you can do it "just in case".

In general, the only other requirement is the 411(d)(6) clause in your plan amendment.

My guess is that your actuary will say the cost impact of this change is zero.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use