Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

FYI

In the IRS phone forum on MAP-21, today, Michael Spaid, IRS Actuary posed a question from a forum participant,

"Assume a DB plan implements MAP-21 effective 2012 as intended by the law. If the Plan prescribes that the 110% test to determine restrictions on pre-termination distributions to HCEs under 401(a)(4) uses Funding Target as a proxy for Current Liability, then for this purpose may the FT recognize the MAP-21 rates?"

Mr. Spaid commented, "The IRS is not taking a position on this. Do what seems reasonable."

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Thank you. So he didn't say it was reasonable, but didn't say it was totally off. Does anyone have clients who are using the rates for this purpose?

Posted

Yes, I, all of them.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Guest Jeff Hartmann
Posted

In my opinion, it is quite "reasonable" to use MAP-21 interest rates for the 110% test, since those rates are being used for AFTAP's.

All of our 110% calcs use MAP-21 rates.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use